Effect of Different Types of Mulches on Yield of Pumpkin in Salt Affected Soil
Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research, Volume 9, Issue 4,
For reducing soil salinity and obtaining a sustainable yield, a low-cost and farmer-friendly method is required for pumpkin, a well-liked vegetable. Accordingly, a field experiment was carried out in Salinity Management and Research Center, Soil Resource Development Institute, Batiaghata, Khulna during Kharif-1 season of 2021 to investigate the effect of different types of mulches on soil salinity and yield of pumpkin. The experiment includes three treatments viz. no mulch (control), straw mulch and mulching paper. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. Soil salinity was recorded at 30 days intervals. All mulching materials effectively reduced the salt accumulation in the root zone. After three months of seed sowing, the highest soil salinity (11.32 dS/m) and lowest soil salinity (6.24 dS/m) were found at no mulch (control) and mulching paper treatment respectively in the month of May. Mulching treatments markedly increased the growth and yield attributes of pumpkins. The highest value of three growth parameters i.e., fruit length (26.92 cm), fruit diameter (94.09 cm) and fruit size (2037 cm2) was found on mulching paper as compared to control. Again, the highest flesh thickness (3.94 cm), fruit weight (4.73 kg) and yield (31.18 t/ha) were recorded at mulching paper treatment whereas the lowest yield (16.68 t/ha) was found at no mulch (control). The results revealed that the use of mulching paper decreased salinity and also increased the yield of pumpkin in saline soil. These findings suggest that the application of mulching paper not only reduces soil salinity but also increases the yield of pumpkins.
- straw mulch
- mulching paper
- sweet gourd
How to Cite
Kiramana JK, Isutsa DK. First detailed morphological characterization of qualitative traits of extensive naturalized pumpkin germplasm in Kenya. International Journal of Development and Sustainability. 2017;6(7):500-525.
Yadav M, Jain S, Tomar R, Prasad GB, Yadav H. Medicinal and biological potential of pumpkin: An Updated Review. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2010;23(2):184–190.
Anonymous. Per capita deficiency of vegetables 158gm a day. The Financial Express; 2022.
BBS. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh, (33rd Series). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2021.
MoA and FAO. Master Plan for Agricultural Development in the Southern Region of Bangladesh. Ministry of Agriculture; 2013;37-40.
Fertilizer Recommendation Guide (FRG). Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), Farmgate, Dhaka. 2012;66.
Roychoudhury A, Chakraborty M. Biochemical and molecular basis of varietal difference in plant salt tolerance. Annual Review & Research in Biology. 2013;3(4):422-454.
Haque MA, Jahiruddin M, Hoque MA, Rahman MZ, Clarke D. Temporal variability of soil and water salinity and its effect on crop at Kalapara upazila. Journal of Environmental Science & Natural Resources. 2014;7(2):111-114.
Sun SJ, Fan YM, Xu ZH, Zhang XD, Chi DC. Effects of planting density on soil moisture and corn yield under plastic film mulching in a rain-fed region of northeast China. Chinese Journal of Ecology. Chinese.2014;33:2650– 2655.
Bu L, Liu J, Zhu L, Luo S, Chen X, Li SQ. The effects of mulching on maize growth, yield and water use in a semi-arid region. Agriculture Water Management. 2013; 123:71–78.
Zhang G, Zhang X, Hu X. Runoff and soil erosion as affected by plastic mulch patterns in vegetable field at Dianchilake's catchment, China. Agricultural Water Management. 2013;122: 20-27.
Sikder MU, Haque MA, Jodder R, Kumar T, Mondal D. Polythene Mulch and Irrigation for Mitigation of Salinity Effects on Maize (Zea mays L.). The Agriculturists. 2016;14(2):1-13.
Anonymous. Bangladesh agro-meteorological information portal. Department of Agricultural Extension; 2022.
Dong H, Li W, Xin C, Tang W, Zhang D. Late planting of short-season cotton in saline fields of the Yellow River Delta. Crop Sci. 2010;50:292–300.
Pang H, Li Y, Yang J, Liang Y. Effect of brackish water irrigation and straw mulching soil salinity and crop yields under monsoonal climatic conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2010;97:1971-1977.
Taia A. Abd El-Mageed, Wael M. Semida, Mohamed H. Abd El-Wahed. Effect of mulching on plant water status, soil salinity and yield of squash under summer-fall deficit irrigation in salt affected soil. Agricultural Water Management. 2016; 173(C):1-12.
Khan S, Pal M, Kumar V. Influence of different mulches on growth and yield of sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica L.). Plant Archives. 2015;15(1):393-395.
Islam F, Quamruzzaman A, Mallick SR. Effect of different mulch paper on growth and yield of different high value vegetables in Bangladesh. Agricultural Sciences. 2021;12:237-246.
Yaseen R, Shafi J, Ahmad W, Rana MS, Salim M, Qaisrani SA. Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch on Soil Physical Properties, Growth and Yield of Maize. Environment and Ecology Research. 2014;2(3):122-137.
Mahadeen AY. Effect of polyethylene black plastic mulch on growth and yield of two summer vegetable crops under rain-feed conditions under semi-arid region conditions. American Journal of Agricultural Biological Sciences. 2014; 9(2):202-207.
Yonggan Z, Yuyi L, Jing W, Huancheng P, Yan L. Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity and increases sunflower yield in saline soils. Soil and Tillage Research. 2016;155: 363-370.
Akhter F, Mostarin T, Islam MN, Akhter S. Effect of Mulches and Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Squash (Cucurbita pepo).The Agriculturists. 2018; 16:25-34.
Ibraheem FF, Allel WB, Hussien JM. Effect of soil mulching, organic and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of summer squash. International Journal of Agricultural Statical Scencei. 2019;15(2): 677-85.
Farah AH, Al-Ghobari HM, Zin El-Abedin TK, Alrasasimah MS, El-Shafei AA. Impact of partial root drying and soil mulching on squash yield and water use efficiency in arid. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):706.
Abstract View: 151 times
PDF Download: 50 times