Combining Ability, Heritability and Genetic Variance in Tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) Genotypes
Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research,
A study was conducted to determine gene actions controlling yield and other qualitative traits of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) as well as combining ability among selected genotypes at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Five tomato genotypes and ten offspring (F1), obtained from a 5×5 diallel crosses were sown in plots, arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design, with three replicates. Data were collected on plant height (PH), number of cluster per plant, days to 50% flowering (50%FL), individual fruit weight (IFW), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), pericarp thickness (PT), number of lobe (NOL), number of seeds per fruit (NSPF), fruit lycopene (LYCOP), ascorbic acid content (ASCO) and fruit yield (YH). Data collected were subjected to Analysis of Variance (P=0.05). Also, diallel analysis was carried out to determine the General and Specific combining abilities (GCA and SCA) of the parents and hybrids respectively, following the Griffing (1956) Method II for partial diallel analysis. Results obtained showed significant differences among the genotypes, for all the characters measured. Also, non-additive and additive gene actions were responsible for the genetic control of the traits. The ratio of GCA and SCA were < 1 for Plant height, CPPL, 50%FL, IFW, NFPP, PT, NOL, NSPF, LYCOP, ASCO and YH thus revealing the preponderance of non-additive gene action. GCA analysis suggested that parents Uc-op and Ibadan-local were the best general combiners while, SCA performance suggested that FDT4 X FDT2 was the best specific combiner. Broad sense heritability for NOL, NSPF, LYCOP, and ASCO were above 90%, indicating that they were highly heritable while narrow sense heritability of NOL was very high (55% and 83% respectively), PH, NSPF, NFPPL and LYCOP were moderate ranging between 20% and 38%. It is concluded that high yielding tomato hybrids, best combiners and a guide line for the assessment of relative parents breeding potential of the parents could be established following diallel technique.
- gene actions
How to Cite
Idah AP, Aderibigbe BA. Quality changes in dried tomatoes stored in sealed polythene and open storage systems. Leonardo Elect. Journal of Agricultural Practical Technology; 2007.
De Lonney. Tomato in Romain, H.R (ed). Crop production in Tropical Africa. Dgic. Brussels, Belgium. 2001;467 — 475.
Food and Agriculture Organization FAO. Plant genetic resource for food and agriculture. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010.
Saleem MY, Asghar M, Iqbal Q, Ur-Rahman A, Akram M. Diallel analysis of yield and some yield components in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Pakistian Journal of Botany. 2013;45: 1247-1250
Wakawa RC, Gadzama AA. Economic analysis of tomato production. RJMSTNG. 2012;1(4).
Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1956a;9:463-493.
Shahabuddin A, Quamruzzaman AKM, Nazim UM. Combining ability estimates of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in late summer. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 2009;7:43-56.
Pandey P, Pandey VR, Tiwari DK, Yadav SK. Studies on direct selection parameters for seed yield and its component traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). African Journal of Agricultural Resources. 2015;10:485-490.
Senapati BK, Kumar A. Genetic assessment of some phenotypic variants of rice (Oryza spp.) for some quantitative characters under the Gangatic plains of West Bengal. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2015;14:187-201.
Franco MC, Cassini ST, Oliveira VR, Vieira C, Tsai SM, et al. Combining ability for nodulation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes from Andean and Middle American gene pools. Euphytica. 2001;118(3): 265-270.
Tiwary DK, Pandey P, Giri SP, Dwivedi JL. Heterosis studies for yield and its components in rice hybrids using CMS system. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 2011;10(1):29-42.
Ibirinde DO, Aremu CO. Trait variability studies on African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) Grown in the Guinea Savanna Agro-ecological Zone of South-Western Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Biological Research. 2013;3(3):422-427.
Akhtar KP, Saleem MY, Asghar M, Ali S, Sarwar N, Elahi MT. Resistance of Solanum species to Phytophthora infestans evaluated in the detached-leaf and whole- plant assays. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2012;44:1141-1146.
Tiwari RN, Choudhury B. Tomato. In: Solanaceous Crops. (Eds.): B. Som & K.N. Prokash. Calcutta. 1986; 224-280.
Dar RA, Sharma JP. Genetic variability studies of yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal Plant Breeding Genetic. 2011;5:168-174.
Singh PK, Singh B, Pandey S. Genetic variability and character association analysis in tomato. Indian Journal Plant Genetic Resources. 2006;19:196-199.
Singh A, Singh AK, Singh V, Singh N, Singh VN, Shamim M, Vikram P, Singh S. Genetic variability among traits associated with grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to drought at flowering stage. African Journal of Agricultural Resource. 2014;9:1252-1264.
Harder LD, Barclay RMR. The functional-significance of poricidal anthers and buzz pollination - controlled pollen removal from dodecatheon. Functional Ecology 8:509-517. (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Theoretical applied Genetics. 1994; 44:358-363.
Kaushik SK, Tomar DS, Dixit AK. Genetics of fruit yield and it’s contributing characters in tomato (Solanum lycopersiconm) Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2011;3:209-213.
Kumar S, Das M, Singh A, Ram G, Mallavarapu GR, Ramesh S. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science. 2001;23:617–23.
Hannan MM, Ahmed MB, Razuy MA, Karim R, Khatun M, Hayda A, Hossaine M, Roy UK. Heterosisand correlation of yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.).American Eurasian Journal of Science Resources. 2 Heliothesarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomatoes. Journal of Economics Entomology. 2007;94.
Singh G, Nandapuri KS. Combining ability studies in tomato cultivars with functional male sterility lines. Journal Resources Punjab Agricultural University. 1974;7:367-372.
Prabhushankar HR. Genetic analysis of yield and yield components in tomato. M.Sc.(Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci, Dharwad (India); 1990.
Dundi, K. B. 1991. Development of F1 hybrid in tomato. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci, Dharwad (India).
Dharmatti PR, Madalageri BB, Patil RV, Gasti VD. Heterosis studies in tomato. Karnatka Journal of Agricultural Science. 1996;9:642-648.
Patil S, Bhalekar MN, Kute NS, Shinde GC, Shinde S. Genetic variability and interrelationship among different traits in F3 progenies of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Bioinfolet. 2013. 10:728-732.
Wammanda DT, Kadams AM, Jonah PM. Combining ability analysis and heterosis in a diallel cross of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;5(16):2108-2115.
Rewale VS, Bendale VW, Bhave SG, Madav RR, Jadhav BB. Combining ability of yield and yield components in okra. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. 2003;28:244-246.
Medagam TR, Kadiyala H, Mutyala G, Hameedunnisa B. Exploitation of Heterosis in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. 2013;4:25-40.
Fawusi MOA. Emergence and seedling growth of pepper as influenced by soil compaction nutrient status and moisture regime. Society for Horticultural Science. 1978;9:329-335.
Food and Agriculture Organization FAO. Tomato Production statistic, FAOSTAT; 2008.
Gao G, Bergefurd B, Precheur B. Growing tomatoes in the home garden. Fact Sheet. Agriculture and Natural Resources. HYG-1624-10; 2010.
Griffing B. A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity. 1956b;10:31-50
Mohamed SM, Ali EE, Mohamed TY. Study of heritability and genetic variability among different plant and fruit characters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). Int. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2012;1:55-58.
Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Filho JBM. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. 6th ed. Springer, Iowa, USA; 2010.
Hartz T, et al. Processing tomato production in California. UC Vegetable Research and Information Center; 2012.
Hans D, Jerry C, walter M, Josha K, Wilfred. Integrated Vegetable Pest Management Natural Resources Institute University of Greenwich U.k. 2002;94.
Haydar A, Mandal MA, Ahmed MB, Hannan MM, Karim R, Razvy MA, Roy UK, Salahin M. Studies on genetic variability and interrelationship among the different traits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Middle-East Journal of Sciences Resources. 2007;2(3-4):139-142.
Kumar S. Genetic variability and interrelationship of traits in F3 progenies of tomato (Lycoperscion esculentum Mill.) under cold desert of Leh-Ladakh. Crop Improvement. 2010;37:66-72.
Saeed, A, Hayat, K, Khan, A.A, Iqbal, S, Abbas, G. 2007. Assessment of genetic variability and heritability in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 9:375-377.
Singh AK. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in tomato under cold arid region of Ladakh. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2009;66:400-403.
Kumar D, Kumar R, Kumar S, Bhardwaj ML, Thakur MC, Kumar R, Thakur KD, Dogra BS, Vikram A, Thakur A, Kumar P. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2013;19:313-323.
Islam MS, Mohanta HC, Ismail MR, Rafii MY, Malek MA. Genetic variability and trait relationship in cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. cerasiforme (Dunnal) A. Gray). Bangladesh J. Bot. 2012;41:163-167.
Osekita OS, Ademiluyi AT. Genetic advance, heritability and character association of component of yield in some genotypes of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum (Mill.) Wettsd. Academic Journal of Biotechnology. 2014;2:006- 010.
Abstract View: 43 times
PDF Download: 29 times