Leaf Nutrient Concentrations and Dry Biomass of Fig Plants as Modified by the Application of NPK: A Preliminary Study

Main Article Content

Selenne Yuridia Márquez-Guerrero
Uriel Figueroa-Viramontes
Jorge A. Zegbe
Jesús Guadalupe Arreola-Ávila
José Antonio Cueto-Wong
Ricardo Trejo-Calzada

Abstract

Aims: The effect of a complete NPK matrix on leaf nutrient concentrations and dry biomass of ‘Black Mission’ fig plant organs was tested under an intensive culture system and protected environment.

Study Design: A randomized complete block design with four blocks was employed.

Place and Duration of Study: The experiment was conducted from April to November 2016 at the Campo Experimental La Laguna, located in Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico. This research station belongs to the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) of Mexico. The experiment was set up under a macro tunnel equipped with a shade mesh with 50% sunlight attenuation.

Methodology: Two-year-old fig plants (cv. ‘Black Mission’) previously propagated from stem cuttings were used. There were three application rates each for N (0, 80, and 160 kg ha-1), P (0, 40 and 80 kg ha-1), and K (0, 80, and 160 kg ha-1) arranged in a balanced factorial matrix of 27 treatments. After harvest, leaf samples were collected to determine nutrient concentrations and they were split into roots, shoots, leaves, and fruit

Results: The greatest total dry biomass was produced by the interaction of 80 kg ha-1 N and 40 kg ha-1 P and yielded the following leaf nutrient concentrations (mean ± SD): N 2.9 ± 0.3%, P 0.11 ± 0.01%, K 2.1 ± 0.4%, Ca 1.4 ± 0.7%, Mg 0.34 ± 0.03%, Fe 166.4 ± 49.5 mg kg-1, Cu 6.3 ± 1.7 mg kg-1, Mn 83.3 ± 20.9 mg kg-1, and Zn 22. 6 ± 3.8 mg kg-1. Application of 80 kg ha-1 N and 40 kg ha-1 P could be suggested for commercial fig production.

Conclusion: Application of 80 kg ha-1 N and 40 kg ha-1 P could be tested under similar commercial production systems; however, the addition of supplemental K deserves further study.

Keywords:
Ficus carica L., macronutrients, micronutrients, synergism-antagonism, nutrient use efficiency.

Article Details

How to Cite
Márquez-Guerrero, S. Y., Figueroa-Viramontes, U., Zegbe, J. A., Arreola-Ávila, J. G., Cueto-Wong, J. A., & Trejo-Calzada, R. (2021). Leaf Nutrient Concentrations and Dry Biomass of Fig Plants as Modified by the Application of NPK: A Preliminary Study. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research, 7(4), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajahr/2020/v7i430102
Section
Short Research Article

References

Sala-Magraner F. El cultivo de la higuera. Publicaciones De Extensión Agraria. ISBN 84-341-0107-6. Madrid, España. Spanish; 1976.

Solomon A, Golubowicz S, Yablowicz Z, Grossman S, Bergman M. Gottlieb HE, Altman A, Kerem Z, Flaishman MA. Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig (Ficus carica L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54:7717–7723.

Sadia H, Ahmad M, Sultana S, Abdullah AZ, Teong LK, Zafar M, Bano A. Nutrient and mineral assessment of edible wild fig and mulberry fruits. Fruits. 2014;69:159–166.

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Fig Production Statistics; 2020.
Available:http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QC/visualize.

Crisosto CH, Ferguson L, Bremer V, Stover E, Colelli G. Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Yahia EE, editor. Postharvest biology and technology of tropical and subtropical fruits. 1st ed. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK; 2011.

Melgarejo P, Martínez JJ, Hernández F, Salazar DM, Martínez R. Preliminary results on fig soil-less culture. Scientia Horticuturae. 2007;111:255–259.

Mendoza-Castillo VM, Vargas-Canales JM, Calderon-Zavala G, Mendoza-Castillo MDC, Santacruz-Varela A. Intensive production systems of fig (Ficus carica L.) under greenhouse conditions. Experimental Agriculture. 2017;53:339-350.

Leonel S, Tecchio MA. Cattle manure fertilization increases fig yield. Scientia Agricola. 2009;66:806-811.

Mordoğan N, Hakerlerler H, Ceylan Ş, Aydın Ş, Yağgmur B, Aksoy U. Effect of organic fertilization on fig leaf nutrients and fruit quality. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2013;36:1128–1137.

Irget ME, Aksoy U, Okur B, Ongun AR, Tepecik M. Effect of calcium-based fertilization on dried fig (Ficus carica L. cv. Sarılop) yield and quality. Scientia Horticulturae. 2008;118:308–313.

Brown PH. Seasonal variations in fig (Ficus carica L.) leaf nutrient concentrations. Hort Science. 1994;29:871-873.

Kurubar AR, Allolli TB, Naik MK, Angadi SG. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on fruit characters, quality and economics of fig production (Ficus carica L.). Acta Horticulturae. 2017;1173:213-216.

Moreno DA, Pulgar G, Villora G, Romero L. Nutritional diagnosis of fig tree leaves. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1998;21:2579–2588.

Holstein H, Crisosto GM, Crisosto CH. Fertigation with potassium increases size and yield in fresh figs growing in California. Acta Horticulture. 2017;1173:177-181.

Kalra Y. Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA; 1997.

Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He Z L. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2001;32:921–50.

Baligar VC, Fageria NK. Nutrient use efficiency in plants: An overview. In: A. Rakshit A, Singh H, Sen A, editors. Nutrient use efficiency: From basics to advances. Springer, New Delhi; 2014.

Fageria NK, Oliveira JP. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium interactions in upland rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2014;37:1586-1600.

Márquez-Guerrero SY, Figueroa-Viramontes U, Cueto-Wong JA, Arreola-Ávila JG, Zegbe JA, Trejo-Calzada R. Variación estacional de la concentración foliar de nutrimentos en huertas de higuera bajo sistemas de producción intensiva. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas. Spanish. 2019;10:525-537.

Cruz AF, De Almeida GM, Wadt PGS, De Carvalho-Pires M, Gerosa-Ramos ML. Seasonal variation of plant mineral nutrition in fruit trees. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2019;62:1-8.

Sun R, Sun L, Jia M. Analysis of psoralen and mineral elements in the leaves of different fig (Ficus carica) cultivars. Acta Horticulturae. 2017;1173:293-296.

Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant physiology. Sinauer Ass. In., Pub. Sunderland, Mass., USA; 2012.

Brunetto G, Bastos de Melo GW, Toselli M, Quartieri M, Tagliavini M. The role of mineral nutrition on yields and fruit quality in grapevine, pear and apple. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2015;37:1089-1104.

Rietra RPJJ, Heinena M, Dimkpab CO, Bindrabanb PS. Effects of nutrient antagonism and synergism on yield and fertilizer use efficiency. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2017;48:1895-1920.

Shabala S. Regulation of potassium transport in leaves: From molecular to tissue level. Annals of Botany. 2003;92:627–634.

Proebsting EL, Warner RM. The effect of fertilizers on yield, quality and leaf composition of figs. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1954;63:10–18.

Sultan HMNMI. Effect of fertilization on fig transplants (Master of Science in Horticulture Thesis). Benha University, Banha, Egypt; 2020.

Malvi UR. Interaction of micronutrients with major nutrients with special reference to potassium. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;24:106-109.

Marschner P. Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, USA; 2012.

Westwood MN. Temperate zone pomology-physiology and culture. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA; 2009.

Olivares BO, Araya-Alman M, Acevedo-Opazo C, Rey JC, Cañete-Salinas, P, Giannini-Kurina F, Balzarini M, Lobo D, Navas-Cortés JA, Landa BB, Gómez JA.Relationship between soil properties and banana productivity in the two main cultivation areas in Venezuela. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2020;20(3):2512-2524.

Zegbe JA, Serna-Pérez A, Mena-Covarrubias J. Mineral nutrition enhances yield and affects fruit quality of ‘Cristalina’ cactus pear. Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;167:63-70.